Transcript

Transcript of YouTube Video: The Most Important Explosion in History

Transcript of YouTube Video: The Most Important Explosion in History

The following is a summary and article by AI based on a transcript of the video "The Most Important Explosion in History". Due to the limitations of AI, please be careful to distinguish the correctness of the content.

Article By AIVideo Transcript
00:00

On February 23rd, 1987, an  explosion rocked the sky

00:03

that was unlike anything anyone had seen

00:05

not just in living memory, but in centuries.

00:07

If you had a keen eye and lived  in the southern hemisphere,

00:10

you could step outside on a clear night

00:12

and witness a bright dot that wasn’t there before.

00:14

It’s as if a new star appeared.

00:16

But it wasn’t a new star, though.

00:17

It was a supernova, one of the most violent events

00:20

that can happen in our universe.

00:21

And it was the first supernova to be visible

00:23

to the naked eye since the telescope was invented!

00:26

In the decades since, researchers  have learned an astronomical

00:29

amount of new science by  studying this one explosion.

00:31

I’m talking right up until  2023, when they finally solved

00:34

the mystery of what it left behind.

00:37

[♪ INTRO]

00:40

Nothing lasts forever, including stars. And the reason they’re  shining in the first place is

00:44

they’re using up a bunch of  nuclear fuel inside of them.

00:47

And as anyone who has ever had to worry about

00:48

surging gas prices or getting hangry  knows, fuel inevitably runs out.

00:53

But while some stars like our own Sun are content

00:55

to end their lives with a proverbial  whimper, others go out with a bang.

00:59

A near-instant, massive explosion  that tears the star apart.

01:03

Our galaxy is supposed to have two or three

01:04

of these supernovas every century.

01:06

But most of the time we can’t see them from Earth.

01:08

They’re often too far away, with too  much interstellar dust in the way.

01:11

That’s why the previous great supernova,

01:13

one that an average person could step outside

01:16

and spot without a telescope, was  seen all the way back in 1604!

01:20

But luckily for astronomers,  there are super fancy telescopes

01:22

that let them look at millions of other galaxies

01:25

and hunt for supernovas that are  way too dim to see otherwise.

01:28

And the one that happened in 1987  did happen in another galaxy.

01:31

Sure, it’s the Large Magellanic  Cloud, which is a dwarf galaxy

01:34

on the Milky Way’s back porch. But it counts!

01:36

And at roughly 160,000 light years away from us,

01:40

the light from this supernova had 160,000 years

01:43

to spread out as it traveled through space.

01:44

Which is why it was a lot less  bright than that 1604 explosion.

01:48

But what it lacked in visual brilliance,

01:49

it made up for as a brilliant bed-time story.

01:52

Early in the morning on February 24th,

01:53

at Las Campanas Observatory  high atop a Chilean mountain,

01:56

astronomer Ian Shelton was developing

01:58

his final photographic plate of the night.

02:00

And as he scanned the image  captured on that plate,

02:02

he saw a star that didn’t used to be there.

02:05

He rushed outside to check, and, to his surprise,

02:07

he could see this “new star” with  his own eyes in the night sky.

02:10

Of course, Shelton hadn’t  witnessed a star being born.

02:12

It was the opposite. And he  and his colleagues scrambled

02:15

to get a message to the  International Astronomical Union,

02:18

which involved a 100 kilometer  drive to the nearest town.

02:21

Oh, and because astronomers are  so amazing at naming things,

02:24

they eventually gave this once-in-many-lifetimes

02:26

supernova a very catchy name…

02:28

SN1987A.

02:30

Eventually, astronomers were able to pin down

02:32

exactly which star in the sky went boom.

02:34

It went by the name, um… this… and it was roughly

02:38

20 times more massive than our Sun.

02:40

Now, being so massive, you might think it’d be

02:42

able to live a lot longer than our Sun will.

02:45

But for stars, it’s actually the opposite.

02:47

The more mass you’ve got, the  faster you burn through your fuel.

02:50

So while our Sun is roughly halfway  through its 10 billion year lifecycle,

02:54

the progenitor to SN1987A kicked the astronomical

02:57

bucket at the ripe old age  of only 10 million years.

03:00

Of course, the supernova  at the end of its life was

03:02

even more of a pinprick in the  greater timeline of the universe.

03:05

The winds of change started about a

03:07

million years before the actual explosion.

03:09

The star’s core ran out of its  primary fuel source, hydrogen.

03:12

And with no way to spew out a bunch of energy,

03:14

it started collapsing under its own gravity.

03:16

But that near collapse actually helped the star

03:18

switch over to burning the next  lightest thing available: Helium.

03:21

But eventually, it ran out of helium.  So it switched to another fuel.

03:24

And this happened again and again until there was

03:27

nothing left that the star could use,  and its nuclear furnace turned off.

03:30

And at that point, gravity  took over one final time.

03:33

In just a few tenths of a second,  the core collapsed down from being

03:36

roughly Earth-sized to a sphere  the size of a small city,

03:40

creating a stupendously powerful  shockwave that ripped the star apart.

03:43

And over the next few months,  that explosion released

03:46

as much energy as our Sun does  over a hundred million years.

03:49

In fact, it peaked in  brightness a full three months

03:52

after astronomers first detected it!

03:54

We’ll get back to why that happened later,

03:55

but 160,000 years after that initial explosion,

03:58

all that light finally reached the Earth,

04:01

including Dr. Shelton’s photographic plate.

04:03

But after that momentous night  in the Chilean mountains,

04:05

astronomers realized there was  another signal from the supernova

04:08

that had arrived just a bit  earlier. And it was much weirder.

04:11

This episode is brought you by this months

04:13

Presidents of Science Mclaren  Stanley and Charlie Stanley.

04:17

How can there be two presidents?

04:18

Democracy.

04:19

Maybe we should rename it.

04:20

Leave your suggestions in the comments.

04:22

Anyway, thank you both for being so awesome

04:24

And supporting us over on Patreon.

04:26

If you, dear viewer, want to learn more about

04:28

Becoming president of Science or about

04:30

one of our other wonderful patron tiers,

04:32

Go to Patreon.com/SciShow.

04:35

In the seconds surrounding the final collapse,

04:41

the nuclei in the star’s  core went through one final,

04:49

sudden nuclear reaction,  which produced a burst of odd,

04:56

obscure particles called  

04:59

neutrinos.

04:59

These fundamental particles  are infamous for having

04:59

almost zero interaction  with other kinds of matter.

04:59

While a high-energy particle of light is stopped by a few centimeters of lead shielding,

05:00

you’d need a wall that’s around a light year thick to stop an average neutrino.

05:00

So it’s basically impossible  to capture a single neutrino

05:00

in even the fanciest neutrino detector.

05:02

But if you’ve got enough of them streaming

05:03

through space, statistics wins out.

05:05

So in 1987, a few hours before the light

05:08

of SN1987A reached Earth, neutrino observatories

05:10

around the world noticed a  distinct spike in detections.

05:13

Since that spike happened at  one precise moment in time,

05:16

it suggested there was a sudden wave of neutrinos,

05:19

generated by a single event, that  had just passed through the Earth.

05:22

And the cool thing is, there was  a tiny bit of luck involved here.

05:24

Neutrinos had been known about for a few decades,

05:27

but neutrino detectors were  very recent inventions.

05:30

So if the supernova had  happened, like, 20 years earlier…

05:33

which is nothing to the universe…

05:35

we wouldn’t have picked this  part of the signal up at all!

05:37

But wait, why did the neutrinos arrive

05:39

before the light from the explosion?

05:41

Were the neutrinos traveling faster-than-light?

05:44

Well, no. In fact, it was the other way around.

05:46

The light was traveling slower than light…

05:48

or, rather, how fast light  travels in the dead void of space.

05:51

Remember, neutrinos can pass through  basically anything unscathed.

05:54

So as soon as they were created,  they could zip straight through

05:57

the collapsing star and the  surrounding gas with nary a care.

06:00

Meanwhile, the light produced by  the supernova had to push through

06:02

all that stellar matter before it  could escape into interstellar space.

06:05

So to an observer on Earth, it looked like

06:08

the neutrinos got a head start.

06:10

And the fact that they  arrived just a few hours ahead

06:12

after a journey of 160,000 years

06:15

proved that neutrinos must travel  extremely close to light-speed.

06:19

In other words, SN1987A was yet another key piece

06:22

of evidence supporting  Einstein’s theory of relativity.

06:25

But that wasn't all we learned. SN1987A was

06:28

the first major supernova in modern astronomy,

06:30

even if you define “modern” as “After  people started using telescopes”.

06:34

Plus, since it was also the  1980s, scientists had a fleet of

06:36

high-accuracy telescopes not just  around the world, but in space, too.

06:40

So after word got out, countless people aimed

06:42

their equipment at the exact same spot in space,

06:44

staring down the supernova remnant  in the Large Magellanic Cloud.

06:47

And over the past several decades, SN1987A has

06:50

revealed a lot about how supernovas work.

06:53

For example, astronomers learned that they were

06:54

generally correct about how  stars undergo core collapse.

06:57

But it also showed that a few  supernova theories weren’t quite right.

07:00

Remember how astronomers were able

07:01

to identify the star that exploded?

07:03

Well, it was a blue supergiant,  but up until that point,

07:06

astronomers had only ever attributed supernovas

07:08

to their much larger cousins, red supergiants.

07:11

Basically, they thought  that a collapsing blue star,

07:13

like SN1987A’s progenitor,  wouldn’t be able to create

07:16

the signals they were detecting  from other supernova remnants.

07:20

And while it is true that most  core collapse supernovas do come

07:23

from red supergiants, SN1987A  showed they don’t have to.

07:27

Astronomers also realized that before a star dies,

07:29

it can eject way more matter than they thought.

07:32

SN1987A’s blue supergiant  progenitor spent its last several

07:35

thousand years shedding the  plasma in its outer layers.

07:38

And before the big kaboom,  that debris had built up

07:41

into a ring spanning about  a light-year in diameter!

07:44

When the supernova finally  happened, all that light

07:46

slammed into that ring, causing  it to glow with X-ray light.

07:49

And in 2010, the Hubble Space Telescope

07:51

detected this ring was getting brighter,

07:54

producing a structure that media  outlets likened to a pearl necklace.

07:57

While this specific interaction did match

07:59

what astronomers predicted would happen,

08:01

some of the latest images have features

08:03

that astronomers don’t quite understand,

08:04

like structures that they think might be caused

08:06

by what they call reverse-shock waves.

08:08

So it’s a bit of a mixed record for SN1987A

08:11

confirming and denying theories about supernovas.

08:14

But in 2024, the biggest mystery  of them all may have been solved.

08:18

See, ever since astronomers  accepted this “new star” was

08:21

in fact a newly dead star,  there’s been a debate about

08:24

what exactly happened to the  star’s corpse after the explosion.

08:27

Namely, which of the two most extreme objects in

08:30

the universe did the core collapse into?

08:32

A neutron star, or a black hole?

08:34

Both of them are observed  in other supernova remnants,

08:36

so either one is possible.

08:38

But the problem is, for decades,  no one could find anything!

08:41

So maybe the explosion was so  violent there was no remnant,

08:44

or maybe the remnant was something

08:46

completely unseen before in nature…

08:47

some exotic midpoint between a neutron star

08:50

and a black hole called a quark star.

08:52

Or maybe it was just hiding  behind a bunch of dust.

08:54

Hints that it was probably  just a regular ol’ neutron star

08:57

started trickling in a few years ago.

08:58

We even covered the news over on SciShow Space.

09:00

But when the JWST came online in 2022,

09:03

it could use its infrared detectors to peer

09:05

through all that dust with unprecedented detail.

09:08

Astronomers appear to have  finally settled the matter.

09:10

According to NASA, the telescope found

09:12

the tell-tale signs of a  newly-birthed neutron star.

09:15

So as incredible as that stellar implosion was,

09:18

it didn’t quite have enough strength to crush

09:20

the core all the way down to a black hole.

09:22

Instead, the core became a hyper-dense  ball of solid nuclear matter,

09:26

held up by the most extreme force in the universe.

09:28

But we’ve barely scraped the surface in

09:30

the treasure trove of data  that SN1987A left behind.

09:33

It gave astronomers better  estimates of how far away

09:36

the Large Magellanic Cloud is, how  fast the universe is expanding,

09:39

and where the dust in galaxies comes from.

09:41

But perhaps most importantly, it also  fired up the public’s imagination.

09:45

The supernova was even on  the cover of TIME Magazine!

09:48

And I for one think it totally deserved it.

09:51

This supernova was a reminder that,  despite how fleeting our lives

09:54

are to the greater cosmos, we  can see major moments of change.

09:58

We live in a dynamic, evolving,  ever-changing universe.

10:01

And that’s as good a reason  as any to keep looking up.

10:03

And you know what?

10:04

The supernova remnant left behind will

10:06

also change as time marches forward.

10:08

JWST didn’t see the same shape that

10:10

Hubble captured in decades past.

10:12

And whenever the next next-gen space telescope

10:15

decides to take a peek,  it’ll look different again.

10:17

So when our merch team had  to design our latest pin,

10:19

they had to pick which version  of the supernova to go with.

10:22

They went with this image inspired by the JWST.

10:24

If you’d like a tiny supernova  remnant to call your own, you can head

10:27

on over to Complexly.store/SciShow  and pre-order yours today!

10:31

Thanks for watching!

10:32

[♪ OUTRO]