The following is a summary and article by AI based on a transcript of the video "The Most Important Explosion in History". Due to the limitations of AI, please be careful to distinguish the correctness of the content.
00:00 | On February 23rd, 1987, an explosion rocked the sky |
---|---|
00:03 | that was unlike anything anyone had seen |
00:05 | not just in living memory, but in centuries. |
00:07 | If you had a keen eye and lived in the southern hemisphere, |
00:10 | you could step outside on a clear night |
00:12 | and witness a bright dot that wasn’t there before. |
00:14 | It’s as if a new star appeared. |
00:16 | But it wasn’t a new star, though. |
00:17 | It was a supernova, one of the most violent events |
00:20 | that can happen in our universe. |
00:21 | And it was the first supernova to be visible |
00:23 | to the naked eye since the telescope was invented! |
00:26 | In the decades since, researchers have learned an astronomical |
00:29 | amount of new science by studying this one explosion. |
00:31 | I’m talking right up until 2023, when they finally solved |
00:34 | the mystery of what it left behind. |
00:37 | [♪ INTRO] |
00:40 | Nothing lasts forever, including stars. And the reason they’re shining in the first place is |
00:44 | they’re using up a bunch of nuclear fuel inside of them. |
00:47 | And as anyone who has ever had to worry about |
00:48 | surging gas prices or getting hangry knows, fuel inevitably runs out. |
00:53 | But while some stars like our own Sun are content |
00:55 | to end their lives with a proverbial whimper, others go out with a bang. |
00:59 | A near-instant, massive explosion that tears the star apart. |
01:03 | Our galaxy is supposed to have two or three |
01:04 | of these supernovas every century. |
01:06 | But most of the time we can’t see them from Earth. |
01:08 | They’re often too far away, with too much interstellar dust in the way. |
01:11 | That’s why the previous great supernova, |
01:13 | one that an average person could step outside |
01:16 | and spot without a telescope, was seen all the way back in 1604! |
01:20 | But luckily for astronomers, there are super fancy telescopes |
01:22 | that let them look at millions of other galaxies |
01:25 | and hunt for supernovas that are way too dim to see otherwise. |
01:28 | And the one that happened in 1987 did happen in another galaxy. |
01:31 | Sure, it’s the Large Magellanic Cloud, which is a dwarf galaxy |
01:34 | on the Milky Way’s back porch. But it counts! |
01:36 | And at roughly 160,000 light years away from us, |
01:40 | the light from this supernova had 160,000 years |
01:43 | to spread out as it traveled through space. |
01:44 | Which is why it was a lot less bright than that 1604 explosion. |
01:48 | But what it lacked in visual brilliance, |
01:49 | it made up for as a brilliant bed-time story. |
01:52 | Early in the morning on February 24th, |
01:53 | at Las Campanas Observatory high atop a Chilean mountain, |
01:56 | astronomer Ian Shelton was developing |
01:58 | his final photographic plate of the night. |
02:00 | And as he scanned the image captured on that plate, |
02:02 | he saw a star that didn’t used to be there. |
02:05 | He rushed outside to check, and, to his surprise, |
02:07 | he could see this “new star” with his own eyes in the night sky. |
02:10 | Of course, Shelton hadn’t witnessed a star being born. |
02:12 | It was the opposite. And he and his colleagues scrambled |
02:15 | to get a message to the International Astronomical Union, |
02:18 | which involved a 100 kilometer drive to the nearest town. |
02:21 | Oh, and because astronomers are so amazing at naming things, |
02:24 | they eventually gave this once-in-many-lifetimes |
02:26 | supernova a very catchy name… |
02:28 | SN1987A. |
02:30 | Eventually, astronomers were able to pin down |
02:32 | exactly which star in the sky went boom. |
02:34 | It went by the name, um… this… and it was roughly |
02:38 | 20 times more massive than our Sun. |
02:40 | Now, being so massive, you might think it’d be |
02:42 | able to live a lot longer than our Sun will. |
02:45 | But for stars, it’s actually the opposite. |
02:47 | The more mass you’ve got, the faster you burn through your fuel. |
02:50 | So while our Sun is roughly halfway through its 10 billion year lifecycle, |
02:54 | the progenitor to SN1987A kicked the astronomical |
02:57 | bucket at the ripe old age of only 10 million years. |
03:00 | Of course, the supernova at the end of its life was |
03:02 | even more of a pinprick in the greater timeline of the universe. |
03:05 | The winds of change started about a |
03:07 | million years before the actual explosion. |
03:09 | The star’s core ran out of its primary fuel source, hydrogen. |
03:12 | And with no way to spew out a bunch of energy, |
03:14 | it started collapsing under its own gravity. |
03:16 | But that near collapse actually helped the star |
03:18 | switch over to burning the next lightest thing available: Helium. |
03:21 | But eventually, it ran out of helium. So it switched to another fuel. |
03:24 | And this happened again and again until there was |
03:27 | nothing left that the star could use, and its nuclear furnace turned off. |
03:30 | And at that point, gravity took over one final time. |
03:33 | In just a few tenths of a second, the core collapsed down from being |
03:36 | roughly Earth-sized to a sphere the size of a small city, |
03:40 | creating a stupendously powerful shockwave that ripped the star apart. |
03:43 | And over the next few months, that explosion released |
03:46 | as much energy as our Sun does over a hundred million years. |
03:49 | In fact, it peaked in brightness a full three months |
03:52 | after astronomers first detected it! |
03:54 | We’ll get back to why that happened later, |
03:55 | but 160,000 years after that initial explosion, |
03:58 | all that light finally reached the Earth, |
04:01 | including Dr. Shelton’s photographic plate. |
04:03 | But after that momentous night in the Chilean mountains, |
04:05 | astronomers realized there was another signal from the supernova |
04:08 | that had arrived just a bit earlier. And it was much weirder. |
04:11 | This episode is brought you by this months |
04:13 | Presidents of Science Mclaren Stanley and Charlie Stanley. |
04:17 | How can there be two presidents? |
04:18 | Democracy. |
04:19 | Maybe we should rename it. |
04:20 | Leave your suggestions in the comments. |
04:22 | Anyway, thank you both for being so awesome |
04:24 | And supporting us over on Patreon. |
04:26 | If you, dear viewer, want to learn more about |
04:28 | Becoming president of Science or about |
04:30 | one of our other wonderful patron tiers, |
04:32 | Go to Patreon.com/SciShow. |
04:35 | In the seconds surrounding the final collapse, |
04:41 | the nuclei in the star’s core went through one final, |
04:49 | sudden nuclear reaction, which produced a burst of odd, |
04:56 | obscure particles called |
04:59 | neutrinos. |
04:59 | These fundamental particles are infamous for having |
04:59 | almost zero interaction with other kinds of matter. |
04:59 | While a high-energy particle of light is stopped by a few centimeters of lead shielding, |
05:00 | you’d need a wall that’s around a light year thick to stop an average neutrino. |
05:00 | So it’s basically impossible to capture a single neutrino |
05:00 | in even the fanciest neutrino detector. |
05:02 | But if you’ve got enough of them streaming |
05:03 | through space, statistics wins out. |
05:05 | So in 1987, a few hours before the light |
05:08 | of SN1987A reached Earth, neutrino observatories |
05:10 | around the world noticed a distinct spike in detections. |
05:13 | Since that spike happened at one precise moment in time, |
05:16 | it suggested there was a sudden wave of neutrinos, |
05:19 | generated by a single event, that had just passed through the Earth. |
05:22 | And the cool thing is, there was a tiny bit of luck involved here. |
05:24 | Neutrinos had been known about for a few decades, |
05:27 | but neutrino detectors were very recent inventions. |
05:30 | So if the supernova had happened, like, 20 years earlier… |
05:33 | which is nothing to the universe… |
05:35 | we wouldn’t have picked this part of the signal up at all! |
05:37 | But wait, why did the neutrinos arrive |
05:39 | before the light from the explosion? |
05:41 | Were the neutrinos traveling faster-than-light? |
05:44 | Well, no. In fact, it was the other way around. |
05:46 | The light was traveling slower than light… |
05:48 | or, rather, how fast light travels in the dead void of space. |
05:51 | Remember, neutrinos can pass through basically anything unscathed. |
05:54 | So as soon as they were created, they could zip straight through |
05:57 | the collapsing star and the surrounding gas with nary a care. |
06:00 | Meanwhile, the light produced by the supernova had to push through |
06:02 | all that stellar matter before it could escape into interstellar space. |
06:05 | So to an observer on Earth, it looked like |
06:08 | the neutrinos got a head start. |
06:10 | And the fact that they arrived just a few hours ahead |
06:12 | after a journey of 160,000 years |
06:15 | proved that neutrinos must travel extremely close to light-speed. |
06:19 | In other words, SN1987A was yet another key piece |
06:22 | of evidence supporting Einstein’s theory of relativity. |
06:25 | But that wasn't all we learned. SN1987A was |
06:28 | the first major supernova in modern astronomy, |
06:30 | even if you define “modern” as “After people started using telescopes”. |
06:34 | Plus, since it was also the 1980s, scientists had a fleet of |
06:36 | high-accuracy telescopes not just around the world, but in space, too. |
06:40 | So after word got out, countless people aimed |
06:42 | their equipment at the exact same spot in space, |
06:44 | staring down the supernova remnant in the Large Magellanic Cloud. |
06:47 | And over the past several decades, SN1987A has |
06:50 | revealed a lot about how supernovas work. |
06:53 | For example, astronomers learned that they were |
06:54 | generally correct about how stars undergo core collapse. |
06:57 | But it also showed that a few supernova theories weren’t quite right. |
07:00 | Remember how astronomers were able |
07:01 | to identify the star that exploded? |
07:03 | Well, it was a blue supergiant, but up until that point, |
07:06 | astronomers had only ever attributed supernovas |
07:08 | to their much larger cousins, red supergiants. |
07:11 | Basically, they thought that a collapsing blue star, |
07:13 | like SN1987A’s progenitor, wouldn’t be able to create |
07:16 | the signals they were detecting from other supernova remnants. |
07:20 | And while it is true that most core collapse supernovas do come |
07:23 | from red supergiants, SN1987A showed they don’t have to. |
07:27 | Astronomers also realized that before a star dies, |
07:29 | it can eject way more matter than they thought. |
07:32 | SN1987A’s blue supergiant progenitor spent its last several |
07:35 | thousand years shedding the plasma in its outer layers. |
07:38 | And before the big kaboom, that debris had built up |
07:41 | into a ring spanning about a light-year in diameter! |
07:44 | When the supernova finally happened, all that light |
07:46 | slammed into that ring, causing it to glow with X-ray light. |
07:49 | And in 2010, the Hubble Space Telescope |
07:51 | detected this ring was getting brighter, |
07:54 | producing a structure that media outlets likened to a pearl necklace. |
07:57 | While this specific interaction did match |
07:59 | what astronomers predicted would happen, |
08:01 | some of the latest images have features |
08:03 | that astronomers don’t quite understand, |
08:04 | like structures that they think might be caused |
08:06 | by what they call reverse-shock waves. |
08:08 | So it’s a bit of a mixed record for SN1987A |
08:11 | confirming and denying theories about supernovas. |
08:14 | But in 2024, the biggest mystery of them all may have been solved. |
08:18 | See, ever since astronomers accepted this “new star” was |
08:21 | in fact a newly dead star, there’s been a debate about |
08:24 | what exactly happened to the star’s corpse after the explosion. |
08:27 | Namely, which of the two most extreme objects in |
08:30 | the universe did the core collapse into? |
08:32 | A neutron star, or a black hole? |
08:34 | Both of them are observed in other supernova remnants, |
08:36 | so either one is possible. |
08:38 | But the problem is, for decades, no one could find anything! |
08:41 | So maybe the explosion was so violent there was no remnant, |
08:44 | or maybe the remnant was something |
08:46 | completely unseen before in nature… |
08:47 | some exotic midpoint between a neutron star |
08:50 | and a black hole called a quark star. |
08:52 | Or maybe it was just hiding behind a bunch of dust. |
08:54 | Hints that it was probably just a regular ol’ neutron star |
08:57 | started trickling in a few years ago. |
08:58 | We even covered the news over on SciShow Space. |
09:00 | But when the JWST came online in 2022, |
09:03 | it could use its infrared detectors to peer |
09:05 | through all that dust with unprecedented detail. |
09:08 | Astronomers appear to have finally settled the matter. |
09:10 | According to NASA, the telescope found |
09:12 | the tell-tale signs of a newly-birthed neutron star. |
09:15 | So as incredible as that stellar implosion was, |
09:18 | it didn’t quite have enough strength to crush |
09:20 | the core all the way down to a black hole. |
09:22 | Instead, the core became a hyper-dense ball of solid nuclear matter, |
09:26 | held up by the most extreme force in the universe. |
09:28 | But we’ve barely scraped the surface in |
09:30 | the treasure trove of data that SN1987A left behind. |
09:33 | It gave astronomers better estimates of how far away |
09:36 | the Large Magellanic Cloud is, how fast the universe is expanding, |
09:39 | and where the dust in galaxies comes from. |
09:41 | But perhaps most importantly, it also fired up the public’s imagination. |
09:45 | The supernova was even on the cover of TIME Magazine! |
09:48 | And I for one think it totally deserved it. |
09:51 | This supernova was a reminder that, despite how fleeting our lives |
09:54 | are to the greater cosmos, we can see major moments of change. |
09:58 | We live in a dynamic, evolving, ever-changing universe. |
10:01 | And that’s as good a reason as any to keep looking up. |
10:03 | And you know what? |
10:04 | The supernova remnant left behind will |
10:06 | also change as time marches forward. |
10:08 | JWST didn’t see the same shape that |
10:10 | Hubble captured in decades past. |
10:12 | And whenever the next next-gen space telescope |
10:15 | decides to take a peek, it’ll look different again. |
10:17 | So when our merch team had to design our latest pin, |
10:19 | they had to pick which version of the supernova to go with. |
10:22 | They went with this image inspired by the JWST. |
10:24 | If you’d like a tiny supernova remnant to call your own, you can head |
10:27 | on over to Complexly.store/SciShow and pre-order yours today! |
10:31 | Thanks for watching! |
10:32 | [♪ OUTRO] |